- Thread starter mallin
- Start date
-
- Tags
- knox or sollecito
knox/sollecito
spot on there.told too many lies during trial.see the amount of money here family have to try to come up with now.one million to merediths parents.800,000 to each of her three siblings and 40,000 to patrick the barman for her implicating him....awful for her family but no sympathy for her at all.foxy knoxy not looking so cute now.
regarding the hype over the atlantic it has already started.typical
regarding the hype over the atlantic it has already started.typical
knox/sollecito
The knife wasn't in the house where the murder took place, it was found in Sellecioi's house, and Meredith had never been to his place. Both the DNA of Meredith and Knox were found on that knife. Smears of Meredith's blood were found on the blade where she was obviously trying to grab it and push it away, and Fox's DNA was found on the handle. Sellicio's DNA wasn't on the knife (even though it was in his house and he claimed it was his) which is strange isn't it! He probably wrapped it in a glove and took it home. The knife belonged to Knox. She looked evil and it was very sick the way they carressed and kissed for the cameras the day after the killing.
The knife wasn't in the house where the murder took place, it was found in Sellecioi's house, and Meredith had never been to his place. Both the DNA of Meredith and Knox were found on that knife. Smears of Meredith's blood were found on the blade where she was obviously trying to grab it and push it away, and Fox's DNA was found on the handle. Sellicio's DNA wasn't on the knife (even though it was in his house and he claimed it was his) which is strange isn't it! He probably wrapped it in a glove and took it home. The knife belonged to Knox. She looked evil and it was very sick the way they carressed and kissed for the cameras the day after the killing.
Akasya
Postless Pointer
knox/sollecito
Lucky it is not a crime to look evil or to kiss and cuddle, definitely guilty on those terms then.
If the knife as you state was never at the house where the murder took place, then no murder could have happened with that knife. If as you say the knife belonged to Knox, then her dna must be on it by default.
The only expert witness to address the knife wound stated " the shape of the knife does not match the shape of the wounds to the neck "
Steve.
If the knife as you state was never at the house where the murder took place, then no murder could have happened with that knife. If as you say the knife belonged to Knox, then her dna must be on it by default.
The only expert witness to address the knife wound stated " the shape of the knife does not match the shape of the wounds to the neck "
Steve.
Last edited:
giglets
Member
knox/sollecito
The knife in question had been recently washed with bleach - not something you would normally do with a household utensil, without reason.
Also, it was interesting to note that Knox, during her closing address to the Jury, at no point, stated that she did not kill the victim, whereas Sollecito was very clear that he was innocent of that crime.
Sometimes it is as important what you don't say, as what you do.
Knox also (allegedly) made an admission of guilt, when in Police custody, but later retracted it, saying that she had done it under duress. She also altered her version of her whereabouts on the date concerned, stating she was/was not at the murder scene house.
Until an appeal, if any is lodged, presents more compelling evidence, I will trust the findings of the Jury/Judges, who are the only ones to have heard and considered all the evidence and reserve my compassion for the Kercher family, who have behaved impeccably and with great restraint, during these proceedings. They have lost their daughter in brutal circumstances (strangled, suffocated, stabbed) and deserve all our thoughts at this sad time.
Dave
Also, it was interesting to note that Knox, during her closing address to the Jury, at no point, stated that she did not kill the victim, whereas Sollecito was very clear that he was innocent of that crime.
Sometimes it is as important what you don't say, as what you do.
Knox also (allegedly) made an admission of guilt, when in Police custody, but later retracted it, saying that she had done it under duress. She also altered her version of her whereabouts on the date concerned, stating she was/was not at the murder scene house.
Until an appeal, if any is lodged, presents more compelling evidence, I will trust the findings of the Jury/Judges, who are the only ones to have heard and considered all the evidence and reserve my compassion for the Kercher family, who have behaved impeccably and with great restraint, during these proceedings. They have lost their daughter in brutal circumstances (strangled, suffocated, stabbed) and deserve all our thoughts at this sad time.
Dave
knox/sollecito
The knife was removed from the scene of crime by Knox's co-killer. Do you think they would have left it in the room? Really?
Knox never owned up to the knife being hers, but her DNA was on the HANDLE and poor Merdith's DNA was on the BLADE.
Knox's bloodied footprints were all over the house too - the police scientists picked those up with a special fluid and light. How do you explain that? How do you explain Knox's DNA on Meredith's bra clasp? And the DNA of her boyfriend too? How do you explain that all of Knox's DNA was washed away with BLEACH even though she lived in the house?!
How do you explain the fact Knox said she's spent all night at her boyfriends, but was caught with her boyfriend and the drifter on CCTV camera enterring and leaving the house just before and after the murder?
How do you explain Sollecito claiming he spent all night on his PC at home when IT specialists examined the hard drive and PROVED it was idle all night?
Why did Knox rush out and buy bleach in the morning when she was usually dirty, slovenly and lazy - she didn't even bother to flush the toilet after her - and she never tidied up or cleaned the place?
They even smashed the window from INSIDE the house to try and make it look like a burglary. Knox even had an innocent man arresyed and put in prison for 2 weeks after she said he was the killer - she made all that up!
She's a sick evil woman and most people can see that!
The knife was removed from the scene of crime by Knox's co-killer. Do you think they would have left it in the room? Really?
Knox never owned up to the knife being hers, but her DNA was on the HANDLE and poor Merdith's DNA was on the BLADE.
Knox's bloodied footprints were all over the house too - the police scientists picked those up with a special fluid and light. How do you explain that? How do you explain Knox's DNA on Meredith's bra clasp? And the DNA of her boyfriend too? How do you explain that all of Knox's DNA was washed away with BLEACH even though she lived in the house?!
How do you explain the fact Knox said she's spent all night at her boyfriends, but was caught with her boyfriend and the drifter on CCTV camera enterring and leaving the house just before and after the murder?
How do you explain Sollecito claiming he spent all night on his PC at home when IT specialists examined the hard drive and PROVED it was idle all night?
Why did Knox rush out and buy bleach in the morning when she was usually dirty, slovenly and lazy - she didn't even bother to flush the toilet after her - and she never tidied up or cleaned the place?
They even smashed the window from INSIDE the house to try and make it look like a burglary. Knox even had an innocent man arresyed and put in prison for 2 weeks after she said he was the killer - she made all that up!
She's a sick evil woman and most people can see that!
knox/sollecito
I wonder why the drifter got 30 years. Knox and Scilicotti got 25 and 26 years.
That poor barman could have gone down and took the rap had he not had a witness/alibi. Might have been the death penalty in some countries.
Work this one out!!! The Three go down for murder. Yet, only one has the knife. The two bystanders maybe didn't think this was going to be murder but just fooling around.
That poor barman could have gone down and took the rap had he not had a witness/alibi. Might have been the death penalty in some countries.
Work this one out!!! The Three go down for murder. Yet, only one has the knife. The two bystanders maybe didn't think this was going to be murder but just fooling around.
Last edited:
knox/sollecito
Maybe the drifter got an extra 4 years for a further offence, he was a local thief, drugdealer etc, and he did try and escape to Germany after the crime. Probably that's why his sentence was longer. Don't forget, the press don't report each and every thing in the papers - the courts know much more about the case than the public do.
Don't forget too that each country's laws are different. Italian law is obviously different to the UK's, Turkey and the US. Knox, her family and some Americans are trying to play the anti-American card, but what they forget is that an ITALIAN and guy from the CONGO were convicted too. If Knox wanted to be tried by an American jury she should have killed in the US
Panther, you've raised a good point about who actually slit Meredith's throat, but going by the evidence of police, scientists and witnesses - it was Knox. It was also proven that all 3 of them had a knife each. Even though it was Knox who finally killed Meredith, they each played their part in her death by holding her down, terrorising her, beating her, stripping her, sexually assaulting her, raping her, and inflicting knife wounds on her. They were more than just accessories to her murder - they helped Knox deal the final blow. If it was all Knox's doing why didn't two strong powerfully built men grab her and prevent her from doing it? They're all as evil as each other - that's why.
Don't forget too that each country's laws are different. Italian law is obviously different to the UK's, Turkey and the US. Knox, her family and some Americans are trying to play the anti-American card, but what they forget is that an ITALIAN and guy from the CONGO were convicted too. If Knox wanted to be tried by an American jury she should have killed in the US
Panther, you've raised a good point about who actually slit Meredith's throat, but going by the evidence of police, scientists and witnesses - it was Knox. It was also proven that all 3 of them had a knife each. Even though it was Knox who finally killed Meredith, they each played their part in her death by holding her down, terrorising her, beating her, stripping her, sexually assaulting her, raping her, and inflicting knife wounds on her. They were more than just accessories to her murder - they helped Knox deal the final blow. If it was all Knox's doing why didn't two strong powerfully built men grab her and prevent her from doing it? They're all as evil as each other - that's why.
Istanbul_expat
Member
knox/sollecito
I agree that the sentence should stand but the case has generated too much political fall-out (the parents have been CNN twice in Larry's show with all their supporters and even Hilary Clinton is getting involved) so I think that at the very least the sentence will be considerably reduced with probably a jail transfer to the US. My take on this is that the conviction will be overturned in less than a year.
